1. All (0)


  1. All (469)
Home portfolios HUMAN RESOURCE



Area of Expertise:

  • Business & Management


Political Realism

In a bid, to content with ever changing global environments that have a direct impact on the economic and social developments of societies today, international relations plays a key role in enhancing movements that will ensure that various countries are at their best status. Political realism, therefore, remains a major unsolved problem in the limelight of international relations. Despite efforts by members’ countries to work hand in hand to ensure that these issues are settled. Realism, therefore, is referred to as an international political perception that has the effect on the day-to-day management of various systems of governance. It is widely viewed as a problem that has had an impact on the international relations. The fundamental problem arises where self-interests take control of the international relations and various ways in which duties are delegated to people in charge of different economic sectors. The power to coordinate, control, and operate activities are influenced by various events in the political arena. The unsolved problems and various measures and recommendations that should be put in place to help curb these issues are the key areas addressed in this paper. It also considers impacts of these recommendations in relation to establishing a harmonized way of settling the political realism in international relations perspective.
In order to understand best problems that are unsolved at the international or global level, a theory or a game kind of approach has to be involved in order to make clear understanding of conflict resolutions at the global level.  This is best explained with the example as shown: “Two prisoners, for instance, are brought into a precinct.  An attorney to negotiate or discuss  a ‘deal’ for prison length approaches these individuals separately.  These prisoners are presented with two different options: “cooperate or defect”.  In defecting, prisoner “A” traps out prisoner “B”.   Prisoner "A" does not trap  out prisoner “B”, in the assumption that prisoner “B” will also cooperate.  Prisoner “B” is given mirrored options.  The payoff relies on the option prisoners choose. Again,  If a prisoner “A” betrays “B” while “B” cooperates, prisoner “A” comes out on top; if both prisoners cooperate, they both win- a general benefit; when both defects; both lose; and, when prisoner "A" coordinates well, but “B” traps, Prisoner “A” looses.  The sense in this is because it is an international relations (IR) theory that is general and coined as the Prisoners' Dilemma. It stems out from rational choice-Game Theory that is vastly applicable in political science academia.  In recent, however, this dilemma theory has found scholarship in determining and explaining international law of treaties.”  In international relations perspective, Prisoners’ game dilemma has to be employed to help determine the possible solutions to such international or global problems. This approach uses two concepts of “cooperate” and “defect” that apply between two different “prisoners.” Where there are only two possibilities of influencing the outcome of a case. Prisoners’ game dilemma is an ideal presentation of defect and corporate scenario.
The concerned parties in this effect are member states that take part in solving political realism at the international level. This follows differences that arise on treaties that are signed by various countries with their self-interests given first priority. They act as prisoners “A” and “B” that are used in the example of Prisoners’ game dilemma concept that is used to best explain the situations on international relations.
The game implies two essential aspects that involve betrayal or corporation upon a case where two individuals, probably prisoners are key victims. When the first prisoner betrays the second one, then there are chances of “A” winning or benefiting from the case while B looses on the same case. When the reverse of this is applied with the initial prisoner being the second to determine the fate of the other, then the choice made will be the outcome of the case. It is a rat and corporate game that is partly independent of one’s choice and at the same time relies heavily on the second party’s choice. This is a theory that is applicable in resolving International Relations problems that often arise between countries or individuals of different nationalities. It is ideal since it assists in the justification of the treaties and international laws. International Treaties are generally designed with an aim to strengthen relations that exist among nations, and this promotes national cohesion. It is, therefore, ideal to encourage countries or nations to be part of such treaties by being signatories through assuming public commitments that will ensure that member parties abide by the set rules or articles. This concept, however, becomes complex when the situation is presented with more than two victims in the case.
Another problem that is identified with this Prisoners’ game dilemma is the fact that there is no mutual corporation among the involved parties. For instance, a country A can sign a treaty that does not comply with ideas or expectations of the treaties signed by country B. This has always remained a concern to the majority of people who are involved in the global political arena since many leaders are bearing formed opinions that reflect differences in conflicts.
With reflection to real life situation, this concept applies to various cases that can be used to determine a case that possibly exists among people. It is, therefore, ideal to have a clear view of what this concept holds and how it applies to everyday life. It is significant to note that involving international relations in conflicts resolutions plays a crucial role in harmonizing the mutual benefits of the involved parties.
Political realism being a key problem in the international economic and social growth arena, it is ideal to identify possible measures or approaches that are capable of resolving the problem. This requires a strategic plan that will enable the concerned parties to help solve issues. Human rights are considered subjective that does not necessarily rely on the theoretical basis. When  majority of people are in a position to control the ethics of governance, democracy is exercised; conflicts are solved. Political realism is a key international problem that requires well-planned strategies and recommendations that will enhance cohesiveness and ways of making people operate as one community.
Political experience in most cases do not authoritative the social institutions that accommodate the human interests that represent various ethical groups. These have led to various conflicts among different nations that form part of the international community. In order to solve this problem, a well-planned political experience should be put in place. This will  ensure equality and good representation of human interests that will ensure economic and social growth among people. This will help the concerned bodies to participate in developing a cohesive and mutual understanding of basis of politics and development that will ensure harmony and growth in various aspects with a reflection of realism and international relations.
Various scholars purport that various theories reflect on social analysis that will enable good relations among people. This will enable the assist in resolving the problem of realism that arises because of political differences that have a huge impact on the global socialization and economic cohesiveness. The procedures of solving these issues, therefore, require concerned parties to analyze differences that exist between members with different opinions and ideas based on a concept. A negotiation and relationship establishment should be tabled to ensure that their ideological differences are solved. These will help uplift human needs that are universal across different nations.
Another approach to solving and settling the political realism problem in international relations is involving concerned parties that have differences in ideas and  treaties that best reflect their interests. These conflicts can be prevented when such measures are initiated with an aim of promoting social development and presenting human needs and interests.
Economic problems are viewed to have risen from the perceptions of capitalists and communism that resulted into inequality among many parties.  A well established strategy should be put in place to ensure that member parties are experiencing mutual economic positions, and this will assist the majority of people.. This has general interests among different countries with various treaties that uphold their interests.  Therefore, it is recommended that political realism that has a tremendous impact on the social and economic development of member states. This must be exercised in the international peacemaking process that must be enhanced through international relations. This can only be possible when a mechanism is designed to ensure that there is a general goal to achieve a harmonized leadership system where every member’s state is represented.
Another recommendation, that should be put in place to help curb down the effects of realism  is a general leadership system. This will ensure that members of the state are capable of easily coming up with a common treaty that will best present their interest.  This also will encourage a decision to have a common currency that will promote economic growth among people. This is only possible if international relations take advantage to exercise powers and mandate to impose various laws and treaties that ensure unity and mutual benefits to people with different treaties and ideas.
Another recommendation suggests that Issues should be negotiated in a manner that will uplift good relationship among people. ADR is considered to provide grounds for various alternative adjudications that aim at meeting needs for individuals to solve problems that exist among them. This approach works closely with international relations concepts that aim at setting up a goal that will ensure a strategic objective of influencing the political decisions and perceptions of different leaders. This will help settle down political realism that has been identified as one of the unsolved problem at the international corporation and operation levels. ADR and other legal systems are, therefore, believed to have an upper hand to design a knowledge-based strategy that will change perceptions and ideological differences among leaders who are attracted to political realism. This will embrace the spirit of having  international relations as a tool of conflict resolution. It is also considered as a  way in which organizations, individuals, and states or countries best present their ideas with an aim of globally exercising their treaties and set rule of laws.
Recommendations, strategies, and other possible plans that involved member parties can employ to help solve the political realism problem directly rely on the nature of international relations that are in place. This will ensure that these parties have their individual interests well presented and determined based on the passed laws and treaties governing their operations at the international arena. This is a move that will also ensure peace in associating with others and operating political interests with an aim of building up a society with economic orientation.
In conclusion, it is ideal to have a clear understanding of international relations and the view in which it gives to social and economic perspective. This, therefore, forms a fundamental ground that offers an opportunity in solving issues that are viewed at the international level. Political realism, therefore, is viewed as an international problem that requires various approaches and strategies that will enable conflict resolution that arise between different people. Prisoners’ game dilemma is also another concept and approach that enables the understanding of international relations and conflict resolution that arise between different parties with different treaties and ideologies that best represent their positions.  Well-established strategies, therefore, will influence the decision of key contributors to move forward with a view of settling down the problem of realism. This will promote ways of meeting needs and interests of involved parties so that there can be development and growth   in the social and economic perspective.





An introduction to international relations. (2012). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Carlsnaes, W. (2005). Handbook of international relations. London: Sage.
Diez, T., & Hudson, D. (2009). Key concepts in international relations: Thomas Diez and David Hudson. London: Sage.
Jackson, R. H., & Sørensen, G. (2007). Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Lake, D. A., & Powell, R. (1999). Strategic choice and international relations. Princeton, NJ [u.a.: Princeton Univ. Press.
Lawson, S. (2012). International relations. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Lockwood, J. S., Lockwood, K. O. B., & Lockwood, J. S. (1993). The Russian view of U.S. strategy: Its past, its future. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Marks, M. P. (2003). The prison as metaphor: Re-imagining international relations. New York: P. Lang.
National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)., & United States. (n.d.). More water for arid lands: Promising technologies and research opportunities : report of an ad hoc panel of the Advisory Committee on Technology Innovation, Board on Science and Technology for International Development, Commission on International Relations.
Petersmann, E.-U. (1996). International and European trade and environmental law after the Uruguay Round. London [u.a.: Kluwer.
Shimko, K. L. (2013). International relations: Perspectives, controversies and readings. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
Telò, M. (2009). International relations: A European perspective. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.